Before submitting your audit package, review all documents, expected values, and supporting files to confirm that information is consistent across your project. Inconsistencies—such as mismatched assumptions, misaligned facility design documents, or discrepancies between your monitoring plan and model—can result in the package being returned for revisions.
How To
Check alignment across evidence:
Are financial assumptions consistent with LCA assumptions?
Do facility design documents and feedstock details match what’s modeled in the LCA?
Is the monitoring plan consistent with the LCA model?
Does the project description align with the rest of the documentation?
Upload supporting files for deviations or missing documents:
Include notes explaining why files are intentionally placed outside expected locations.
Verify file naming conventions:
Ensure templates and evidence files are clearly and consistently named.
Check publicly published documents:
Remove any confidential or proprietary information from files intended for review or publication.
Tips and Best Practices
Use this checklist as a final step before submission.
Ensure all numeric and text expected values match your supporting documents.
Keep naming conventions consistent to help reviewers quickly identify files.
Double-check any deviations are documented and explained.